Today's "trivia" questions are......

"What are the *actual* connections between U.S. military base 
closings and the "New World Order", with its accompanying "New 
World Police Force"? Why are a number of these bases, currently 
slated to be closed for U.S. military use, currently undergoing 
expensive renovations and additions?" 

You can check the following item out very quickly at the 
Library of Congress, or at any large metropolitan reference 
library, and I can promise you that it won't be time wasted!

Ask for a copy of VOLUME 9 of the 1982 EDITION [*not* the 
current, replacement edition] of the U.S. CODE. Turn to page 
554, where you'll find the beginning of PUBLIC LAW # 87-297 
[1961]. This law was signed by President Kennedy in 1962, 
has received 18 subsequent updates, and its provisions have 
been steadily implemented by every President since. IT CALLS 
FOR THE ELIMINATION OF THE U.S. NATIONAL ARMED FORCES and 
further declares that "NO ONE MAY POSSESS A FIREARM OR LETHAL 
WEAPON EXCEPT POLICE AND MILITARY PERSONNEL". The progressive 
steps in its implementation are:
 
 1. the reduction of the U.S. Armed Forces to 2.1 million 
    personnel.

 2. their irrevokable merger with Russian and Chinese forces, 
    in two stages, to form a World Army [50% of total U.S. 
    force strength will be merged in the first stage; the 
    remaining 50% in the second stage]. 

 3. the irrevokable surrender of authority over such forces 
    to the U.N. Secretary-General [ who alrady has a military 
    planning staff of 80 general officers].

 4. the confiscation of all privately-held firearms.
 
This law is taught and explained in the National War College, 
and the various U.S. Armed Forces Academies. The New World Order 
will require an Army: this is it, and presumably the U.S. itself 
could then find itself policed by foreign troops under the U.N. 
flag. By agreement, THE COMMANDER OF THIS ARMY MUST ALWAYS BE A 
RUSSIAN!

The relevant pages and sections are: page 554; page 555 [lower 
right-hand side of page: defines "disarmament" as elimination 
of U.S. Forces and calls for absolute restrictions on 
privately-owned "deadly weapons"]; page 557, sections [a] and 
[d] [again, require U.S. to eliminate its Armed Forces]; page 
558 deals with "policy formulation" [i.e. the accomplishment of 
these goals]. George Bush said that the passing of authority 
to the Secretary-General was "in transition"; the Supreme Court 
has already ruled that the U.S. Constitution and its provisions 
stand UNDER the U.N. Charter and the Resolutions of the United 
Nations. The U.S. Armed Forces are acting as the U.N.'s "world 
policeman" in the interim.

The provisions of this law are further explained in STATE 
DEPARTMENT PUBLICATION 72-77, which itself is published in 
unabridged form in the 35-page "BLUEPRINT FOR THE PEACE RACE", 
published by U.S. ARMS CONTROL AND DISARMAMENT AGENCY
[PUBLICATION #4, GENERAL SERIES #3, MAY 1962]. I'm sure you find 
this hard to believe, but it's all there in black and white; 
read it for yourself! The implications are staggering but the 
multiple military base closings around the U.S take on a new 
perspective when you see the agenda which that law commits 
the U.S. government to follow! Another small tip is that new 
issues of uniforms [e.g. the new Air Force uniform] reportedly 
have no "U.S."insignia. 

Please do go and read these documents for yourself. It's 
astonishing, but it's exactly as I've described it to you. 
NAFTA is a small but vital part of something *much* bigger!
                                                                                    
Don't be misled by the wording of "Policy Formulation" on page 
558 in volume 9, U.S. CODE, 1982. It was re-written in 1963 to 
pacify objectors, and forbids removal of firearms from the 
populace or reduction in national armed strength "UNLESS IT IS 
PURSUANT TO THE TREATY-MAKING POWER OF THE PRESIDENT OR
AUTHORISED BY LEGISLATION OF THE CONGRESS"! The U.N Charter is 
regarded as an already-binding treaty, so all that is required 
is a U.N. Resolution or Congressional legislation to ban all 
"citizen" armaments. George Bush's father, Preston, helped push 
this law [87-297] through Congress. One of the experts
on it is ex-State Senator Bernadine Smith [Box 1776, HANFORD, 
CALIFORNIA 93232], who resisted it bitterly, and knows its 
contents and intent as well as anybody. Or you could just call 
the National War College and ask innocently for more information 
on it!

                                                    
Two interesting footnotes on PUBLIC LAW 87-297 {1961}: 

 * 200 members of the Trilateral Commission had a late-March 
   meeting over several days in Washington, at which they 
   discussed and agreed on the need for [guess what?] A NEW 
   WORLD ARMY and for U.N. SOVEREIGN CONTROL OF INDIVIDUAL 
   STATES' IMMIGRATION POLICIES AND DECISIONS. On the evening 
   of the 28th of March, their representatives dined with key 
   U.S. government officials and presented these
   "recommendations", and then did the same thing over 
   breakfast the next morning with Clinton. So here it comes!  
   This will lead ultimately to an enormous concentration of 
   power in very few hands. 
  
 * AFT, as the "compliance and enforcement" arm of the Treasury 
   Department [which has a CFR man heading it], has been 
   unlawfully "compelling" gunshop owners across the U.S. to 
   provide the names, addresses and zip codes of all "long gun" 
   [rifle and shotgun] purchasers, when no legal requirement 
   exists for this. They are apparently creating a computerised 
   registry of ALL private weapons across the United States, 
   by locality, street and house. REMEMBER THE CONFISCATION 
   REQUIREMENT FOR ALL PRIVATE WEAPONS EMBODIED IN "A 
   BLUEPRINT FOR THE PEACE RACE" AND IN STATE DEPARTMENT 
   PUBLICATION # 72-77? 
 
THIS LAW IS STILL IN THE *CURRENT* EDITION OF THE U.S. CODE,
ALTHOUGH THE PAGE NUMBERS HAVE BEEN CHANGED. YOU CAN FIND      
IT FAIRLY EASILY BY CHECKING THE INDEX TO THE U.S.CODE.
                    
                      - o O o -

So you think that this is fanciful? Read this news item, 
which appeared earlier this year.....
                                          
RUSSIAN-AMERICAN DEFENCE AGREEMENT CALLS FOR JOINT
MANEUVERS
WASHINGTON: The United States and Russia signed an agreement
Wednesday on military cooperation that provides for joint 
military maneuvers by the two former Cold War foes.
    The Russian Defense Minister, General of the Army Pavel 
Grachev, who is visiting Washington, signed the memorandum of 
understanding with Defense Secretary Les Aspin at a Pentagon 
ceremony.
    The agreement calls for the two sides to hold joint 
maneuvers that practice peacekeeping techniques.
    The agreement also calls for annual meetings between 
Grachev and Aspin and their successors, exchanges between the 
chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and his Russian 
counterpart and a bilateral defense working group to formulate 
projects of Russian-American defense.
    "This ceremony demonstrates again that the relationship 
between our two countries is undergoing historic 
transformation," Aspin said.
    "As President Clinton and President Yeltsin said at their 
Vancouver summit meeting," he said, "we are establishing a 
strategic partnership," Aspin said. "It is a partnership in 
which military and defense relations play a leading role."
    "Russia places its highest priority on its cooperation 
with the United States," Grachev said, "We promise to do all 
in our power...to realize this agreement."
    The Russian-American ground maneuvers will train the two 
sides in peacekeeping techniques. The first units to 
participate will be the U.S. 3rd Mechanized Infantry Division 
and the Russian 27th Motorized Rifle.
    Both division commanders, U.S. Maj. Gen. Leonard Holder, Jr. 
and Russian Maj. Gen. Anatoliy Sidyakin, were on hand for the 
Pentagon ceremony.
    "Our two commanders, right after the signing of this 
agreement, will sit down at a table and start working out a 
whole series of steps to make this all happen," Grachev said.
    Both Grachev and Aspin said they wanted to establish a 
"hotline" between their respective defense establishments 
although provision for that was not actually in the agreement 
they signed.
    In addition to joint peacekeeping exercises, the 
memorandum calls for annual meetings between Aspin and Grachev 
and their successors, exchanges between the chairman of the U.S. 
Joint Chiefs of Staff and his Russian counterpart and a 
bilateral working group to think up more projects for 
Russian-American military cooperation.
    No date or place for the first joint Russian-American ground 
maneuver has yet been set.
    Pressed on whether the exercise would be held this year, 
Grachev noted that the planning time needed for maneuvers of so 
large a scale would mean that if so, it would probably have to 
start during the [?]
    "The 3rd Division commander," he joked, "said if it's OK 
with them, we can go to Siberia and hold them there."
                     
                      - o O o -
    
Interested in learning more? Download NWO_NO!.TXT from this BBS
[or from CRS Online, Toronto], for more background information
and an excellent reading list.

     PLEASE RE-POST THIS FILE WIDELY TO OTHER BBS SYSTEMS!